The future of electricity: Attracting investment to build tomorrow’s electricity sector 

January 30th, 2015, Published in Articles: EE Publishers, Articles: Energize

 

The electricity sector is undergoing an unprecedented transition. In the past, the sector provided affordable, secure and reliable electricity by attracting investors with low risk, stable returns. In the last decade, significant declines in the cost of renewable technologies, combined with new sources of natural gas, have offered the opportunity to simultaneously decarbonise the sector while also increasing energy security and reducing dependence on imported fuels.

OECD countries, i.e. countries which are members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, have spent US$3-trillion on new renewable and conventional power plants, transmission and distribution infrastructure, and energy efficiency measures. This investment has helped to reduce carbon intensity per unit generated by about 1% per annum and increase energy security by reducing imports of fuels by about 4%.

Yet more has to be done, especially as the industry is less than 30% through the process, with a further $8-trillion needed from now until 2040 to meet policy objectives.  The experience of the European Union (EU) – an early mover – raises concerns over the ability to attract this additional investment. As renewable capacity has been deployed in the EU, returns on capital have fallen across the board and risks for investors and technology providers have risen due to policy instability.

This crisis of “investability” has highlighted lessons for policy-makers, regulators, business and investors, whether in the developed or developing markets. To attract the necessary investment, all key stakeholders need to take action. Policy-makers need to create policy frameworks which are efficient, stable and flexible, recognising the inherently uncertain technological and economic environment we live in.

  • Plot the most efficient pathways to policy objectives. Incentivise “no regrets” investments such as energy efficiency technologies, demand response services, and the upgrading of network and generation plant efficiencies. Exploit the most efficient renewable resources within and across borders.
  • Stabilise policy by building in flexibility and working to increase societal support. Recognise inherent uncertainties by investing incrementally. Communicate the value to society of the investments. Reduce investor risk by prohibiting retroactive policy changes.

Regulators need to provide clear direction to markets, while minimising interventions.

  • Ensure clear, effective signals: Provide a clear, stable market signal on carbon pricing to incentivise decarbonisation. Reward efficiency, reliability and flexibility, encouraging predictable, dispatchable, fast responding supply to complement the growth in demand response solutions to balance increasingly volatile supply and demand. Recognise in network tariffs and regulatory frameworks the value of reliable grid capacity.
  • Create “level playing fields” across geographies, businesses and technologies: Harmonise incentives, encourage appropriate physical interconnection and remove unnecessary regulatory barriers to competition between incumbent utilities and new entrants.

Business and investors need to drive innovation in business and investor models to secure the necessary investment.

  • Businesses need to engage with policy-makers and regulators to identify the most efficient pathways. They should evolve strategies and business models which exploit the opportunities in the evolution of centralised generation while also supporting the rise of customer-centric offerings and propositions.
  • Investors should engage with policy-makers and regulators on how best to balance risk and return to attract the required investment. They should continue to innovate in investment structures to finance the evolving risk profile in different parts of the electricity value chain.

While there are many ongoing debates in global energy policy and regulation, these areas of general consensus offer a clear path forward for the transition in OECD markets, a journey which will be watched carefully by developing nations.

Finally, as no single cross-stakeholder body exists, developing a joint, cross-geography, multi-stakeholder task force is recommended to increase communication and share lessons and best practices across borders and throughout the industry. This would help to address the currently “atomised” nature of supervisory and regulatory decision-making bodies. Only by ensuring the viability of investment can policy-makers successfully transition to a more sustainable and efficient energy future.

Acknowledgement

This article is the executive summary of the full report and is published here with permission. The full report may be found at the following website:

www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_FutureOfElectricity_Report2015.pdf

Contact Nicola Wilson, Bain and Company, Tel 011 012-9149, nicola.wilson@bain.com

 

Related Articles

  • Considerations for the next generation of concentrating solar power systems
  • Onsite power for remote mining locations
  • Standby power generation set sizing
  • Installation testing that protects appliances
  • Portable thermal camera for industrial inspection