New guide to green building costs and trends

May 20th, 2019, Published in Articles: PositionIT

The Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA), the Association of South African Quantity Surveyors (ASAQS) and the University of Pretoria’s (UP) Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology recently launched the 2019 edition of Green Building in South Africa: Guide to Costs & Trends. It provides trends and valuable insights about the influence of green design and construction on both capital and operational costs.

The guide is available in electronic format and it will be of benefit to the built environment. The thorough, peer-reviewed research and presentation of the results make it a unique publication of international standard.

Challenging the notion of the “green cost premium”

With increased awareness and education in the built environment regarding the green building movement, a perception that green building attracts a significant cost premium when compared to conventional construction emerged. To address this concern, The Cost of Green Building Study Committee was established in 2014. The 2019 edition includes the committee’s results regarding the business case for green building.

The 2019 edition of Green Building in South Africa: Guide to Costs & Trends.

The 2019 edition of Green Building in South Africa: Guide to Costs & Trends.

“The green cost premium appears to be progressively diminishing over time, largely because of growing maturity in the industry,” says Danie Hoffman, Senior Lecturer at the University of Pretoria’s Department of Construction Economics who is the lead researcher on the project.

Size and location matters

The report also confirmed the 2016 finding of a strong negative correlation between green cost premium and construction size. The larger projects managed to achieve a Green Star certification at a much lower average green cost premium when compared to smaller projects.

The data however also confirmed that the cost premium for buildings smaller than 5000 m2 has reduced significantly from 9,3% (2009/14 data) to 4,6% (2015/18 data).

Office buildings that were developed for single corporate tenants had initially attracted much higher green cost premiums compared to buildings developed for a multi-tenant mix. Since 2015, this gap has been closed. The business case for a comprehensive investment decision should therefore include both the cost premium of constructing the building and the financial performance of the building in operation.

MSCI data confirmed that Green Star certified prime and A-grade offices produced a total return of 11,6% in 2017 versus 8,0% for non-green certified prime and A-grade offices. Better work environments and a lower impact on the environment have led many developers to achieve a significant return on their green building investments.

The authors hope the report will help guide future real estate decision making towards more sustainable, future-ready buildings in South Africa.

Contact Karl Trusler, ASAQS Edutech, edutech@asaqs.co.za

Related Articles

  • Understanding the applications and benefits of ground penetrating radar
  • Meeting assesses land reform implementation progress
  • Surveying remote areas with precision for bird conservation effort
  • Hackathon prepares learners for fourth industrial revolution economy
  • Geospatial information is crucial for Africa’s economic development