Surveying remote areas with precision for bird conservation effort

August 18th, 2019, Published in Articles: PositionIT, Featured: PositionIT

How a new approach to precise positioning is helping solve a century-old problem on an isolated island.

John Houston is not a surveyor. He’d be the first to tell you that. He’s not a keen traveller, either. So what was he doing on a speck of an island in the South Atlantic Ocean, knee deep in brush and muck while operating a high-accuracy GNSS receiver?

It’s all about the birds.

Houston was at work on Gough Island, a British territory roughly 2700 km west of Cape Town, South Africa. First visited by Portuguese explorers early in the 16th century, the tiny landmass covers just 91 km2. Due to its lonely location and undisturbed nature, the island is regarded as one of earth’s least disrupted ecosystems. In 1995, the island was designated as a World Heritage Site by the United Nations Scientific, Educational and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

A prime nesting ground for Atlantic seabirds, Gough Island is home to indigenous birds and invertebrates as well as visiting seals and penguins. Unfortunately, the birds are in trouble, and Houston was there to help.

Fig. 1: John Houston and a colleague share a path with a flock of Southern Rockhopper penguins.

A qualified structural engineer, he had come from Derry, Northern Ireland. His employer, Taylor and Boyd Consulting Structural and Civil Engineers, was working on a project for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), to mitigate a serious threat to the island’s avian population.

Houston would support the RSPB efforts by gathering topographic and geotechnical information, including mapping with GNSS. But even advanced GNSS has limitations, especially in such a remote location. Faced with a demanding schedule and tight requirements for accuracy, Houston decided to use the Trimble CenterPoint RTX positioning service, which enabled him to conduct high-precision real-time GNSS measurements in a challenging and remote environment.

Aside from brief visits by sealing and whaling vessels in the early 19th century, Gough Island has never had notable human habitation. A handful of scientific surveys, including a 1922 visit by famed Antarctic pioneer Ernest Shackelton, established the island as a valuable site for geological, biological and ornithological research. Not until the 1950s, when South Africa established a meteorological station, did Gough Island gain a full time (albeit very small) human population. When Houston and a dozen researchers landed in September 2018, the population of Gough Island more than doubled.

While Gough Island has no native mammals, it has plenty of mice, unintentionally carried to the island by the 19th-century ships. The invading mice soon learned to feed on the eggs and chicks of ground-nesting birds, including Tristan albatross, Atlantic petrel, Gough bunting and Gough moorhen. In roughly 150 years on the island, the mice evolved to become 50% larger than their forebears. Today, they are wreaking havoc on the bird population. Surveys by the RSPB estimate that mice consume roughly two-million eggs and chicks each year.

Considering an albatross lays only one egg each year, the current rate of loss means Gough Island’s birds face extinction.

Fig. 2: A 3D model of the work area on Gough Island. Points were captured with accuracy of 3 to 5 cm.

To protect the birds, the RSPB initiated a project to eradicate the mice from Gough Island. The work involves distributing poisoned bait that will attract and kill the voracious rodents. It’s not the first time that an entire island has undergone mouse eradication. Similar projects on South Georgia Island and Antipodes Island have successfully removed populations of introduced rodents and restored a more natural balance to bird populations in those sub-Antarctic locations. And in the warmer waters north of Hawaii, Midway Island has also received the anti-rodent treatment.

With the Gough Island eradication project planned to take place in 2020, RSPB began planning for facilities needed to support the work. They received permission to establish temporary infrastructure to house, feed and support the taskforce. Because most of the bait will be spread using helicopters, planning also included landing pads and fuel and maintenance installations. The overall goal is to guide installation of the temporary structures with minimal impact on Gough Island’s native flora and fauna.

Houston’s job was to collect information on topography and soils for use in planning and design of the temporary facilities. In addition to the workplaces, the team needed to find sites for pens and medical facilities to keep the buntings and moorhens contained so they don’t eat the poisoned bait. Houston explained that the island-wide mitigation would be conducted during the southern winter while the other seabirds’ migration and feeding patterns took them away from the island.

Precise mapping in remote locations

In order to conduct the design work, Taylor and Boyd needed accurate information on the terrain and existing structures. Adding a surveyor to the team was cost prohibitive, so Houston performed double duty by handling tasks in both surveying and engineering. With only two weeks to complete his work, RTK GNSS seemed to be a good solution for the treeless locale. But Houston’s lack of survey experience and the absence of geodetic control or cellular service on the island combined to make RTK unfeasible. Instead, he used a Trimble R10 GNSS receiver in conjunction with Trimble CenterPoint RTX correction service. The correction service uses a global network of GNSS reference stations combined with satellite communications to enable users to achieve real-time, centimetre-level positioning accuracy, even in remote locations.

Fig. 3: Taylor & Boyd developed a 2D drawing of existing facilities.

Using a Trimble TSC3 controller and Trimble Access field software with the receiver, Houston collected hundreds of 3D points around the project site. He captured the location of existing structures and features, test pits for soil evaluation and ground points for use in topographic modelling. Using the display on the controller he could follow his progress and make sure he covered the necessary ground. In spite of working more than a thousand kilometres from the nearest GNSS reference station, he achieved centimetre accuracy on all survey points; typically 3 to 5 cm in both the horizontal and vertical components.

Even as a self-described “rookie surveyor,” Houston quickly learned to operate the GNSS equipment. On the couple of occasions when he needed guidance, he used the island’s satellite internet link to discuss technical questions with the supplier’s experts. Each day’s work lasted about ten hours. At the end of each day, he reviewed data on the controller, planned the next day’s work and set up the system batteries for recharging.

Aside from cloth tapes used to lay out a rough grid, the receiver was the only survey tool he needed. Although he did not establish any formal benchmarks or control points, Houston did capture several hard points on the existing helipad and building foundations. Those markers will be sufficient to serve as reference points for the upcoming work on the island.

Fig. 4: Plan view of proposed temporary facilities on Gough Island. The survey data enabled planning for horizontal and vertical components.

Houston departed Gough Island with survey data sufficient for the design work ahead. His consulting firm developed 2D contour maps and 3D terrain models of the site, which they shared with RSPB. The society will overlay bird data on the topographic maps and use the information to identify flight paths and nesting areas. Taylor and Boyd will use the maps to set proposed elevations and positions for the temporary structures. The data, which is the first topographical survey ever carried out on the base since it was established in 1963, will also aid the South African government in maintenance and operations of island facilities.

Taking a few moments to reflect on his trip, Houston said the time on the island was well worth the long trip and tough conditions. The opportunity to see and interact with the birds, seals and penguins left a lasting mark. While he doesn’t expect a return trip will be needed, he would jump at the opportunity. “It was a once in a lifetime experience,” he concluded. “I would go back in a heartbeat – with warmer clothes.”

Contact Deon Koen, Trimble, Tel 021 404-1866, deon_koen@trimble.com

Related Articles

  • To readers, customers, suppliers, staff and other stakeholders of PositionIT
  • Mozambique’s land administration modernisation
  • Spatial database receives major update
  • Data observatory moved to the cloud
  • Building a national data repository for integrated spatial planning